AAHRED logoAAHRED home

Partner & Invest

Costed investment cases with published unit economics

Institutional funders should not have to guess what a contribution buys. Each portfolio below states the ticket range, delivery horizon, verified outcome rates and the cost per person reached — before a single conversation begins.

Investment cases

Four funding windows open for FY2026

Outcome rates are drawn from the institutional results framework and independently evaluated cohorts, not from projections.

Water Health Infrastructure Fund

Capitalises solar-powered water systems, sanitation infrastructure and community maintenance enterprises in drought-affected districts.

Ticket range
USD 250,000 – 5,000,000
Horizon
3–5 years
  • 1 water point serves ~1,200 people
  • Diarrhoeal incidence down 54% in mature catchments
  • Community maintenance entities reach cost recovery by month 18
Request the full investment memorandum

Youth Enterprise & Wealth Creation Facility

Blends incubation, mentorship and soft-loan capital to convert graduates and school leavers into employers.

Ticket range
USD 100,000 – 2,500,000
Horizon
2–4 years
  • 68% of enterprises trading at 24 months
  • Average 3.1 jobs created per surviving enterprise
  • Loan portfolio repayment rate of 91%
Request the full investment memorandum

Health Intelligence & Surveillance Platform

Extends interoperable registries, event-based surveillance and geospatial modelling to additional ministries.

Ticket range
USD 500,000 – 8,000,000
Horizon
4–7 years
  • Detection-to-notification cut from 9.1 to 3.4 days
  • Weekly facility reporting completeness at 88%
  • Open technical standards, ministry-owned data
Request the full investment memorandum

Women's Financial Access Programme

Micro-credit linkage, business advisory and leadership pathways for women-led enterprises and savings groups.

Ticket range
USD 150,000 – 3,000,000
Horizon
3–5 years
  • 44% of leadership positions held by women
  • Household nutrition spend up 27% in participating homes
  • Group savings mobilisation multiple of 4.6x
Request the full investment memorandum

Contribution modelling

Model what a contribution delivers

An indicative projection using the same unit economics the secretariat applies when budgeting a new award. Actual reach is confirmed against a co-designed results framework.

The model applies AAHRED's audited FY2025 programme expenditure ratio of 92.4%, meaning 92.4 cents of every dollar reaches direct delivery. Figures are indicative and not a contractual commitment.

USD 250,000

USD 25,000USD 5,000,000
Portfolio

Indicative reach

15,500

people with year-round safe water

To direct delivery

USD 231,000

92.4% programme expenditure ratio

Discuss this contribution

Partnership modalities

Six ways institutions engage with AAHRED

Sovereign & multilateral agreements

Framework agreements with ministries, national public health institutes and multilateral institutions, delivered through national systems with joint reporting.

Restricted programme grants

Single-portfolio or multi-country grants with a costed results framework, quarterly narrative and financial reporting and an independent end-line evaluation.

Strategic unrestricted funding

Core support that allows the secretariat to invest in surge capacity, research infrastructure and rapid response ahead of restricted funding cycles.

Blended finance & impact capital

First-loss, guarantee and concessional structures that crowd private capital into enterprise, water infrastructure and health-supply investments.

Academic & research consortia

Co-principal-investigator arrangements with universities and research institutes, including shared authorship, data-sharing agreements and student placements.

Corporate & foundation partnerships

Multi-year corporate social investment, employee engagement, technology in-kind contributions and matched-giving programmes.

Process

From first conversation to mobilisation in six weeks

A predictable, documented pathway designed around institutional procurement and grant-approval cycles.

  1. Week 1

    Introductory briefing

    Portfolio walkthrough, alignment against your strategy and confirmation of the funding window.

  2. Week 2

    Due-diligence pack

    Registration documents, audited statements, governance charters, safeguarding record and donor references released under NDA.

  3. Weeks 3–4

    Technical co-design

    Joint results framework, budget build-up, risk register and monitoring plan developed with your technical team.

  4. Weeks 5–6

    Agreement & mobilisation

    Grant or partnership agreement executed, inception workshop convened and baseline data collection begins.

Ecosystem

The institutions we deliver with

AAHRED works as a convener across sovereign, multilateral, academic and private capital, with consortium agreements governing data, authorship and accountability.

Sovereign & regional bodies

  • Ministries of Health
  • National Public Health Institutes
  • Regional economic communities
  • National statistics offices
  • County & sub-national governments

Multilateral & development finance

  • UN technical agencies
  • Development finance institutions
  • Global health financing mechanisms
  • Regional development banks
  • Humanitarian pooled funds

Academic & research

  • African universities & schools of public health
  • International research consortia
  • Health economics institutes
  • Data science and geospatial labs
  • Clinical trial networks

Philanthropy & private sector

  • Family foundations & endowments
  • Corporate social investment funds
  • Impact investors & blended finance vehicles
  • Technology and connectivity partners
  • Diaspora giving circles

Tripartite operating model

Think tank, implementation partner and governance/MEL advisory in one institution

Evidence generation translates into execution and delivery, which is in turn evaluated and governed — closing the loop between research, policy design, operations and accountability. Each arm is independently staffed and independently reported, so evaluation is never marked by the team that delivered the work.

Pillar 1

Think Tank & Applied Research Arm

Evidence generation, policy analytics and horizon scanning

  • Translational policy research turning epidemiological, macroeconomic and spatial data into legislative roadmaps and ministerial briefs.
  • Econometric and micro-simulation modelling: cost-benefit analysis, UHC fiscal space assessment and predictive shock modelling.
  • Policy harmonisation with AU Agenda 2063, the Abuja Declaration, the Maputo Plan of Action and Africa CDC frameworks.
  • Ethics, bioethics and data sovereignty protocols safeguarding indigenous health data, genomic assets and vulnerable population registries.
Core outputs
Ministerial briefs, costed policy options, national investment cases, peer-reviewed papers and open data dictionaries.
Methods & instruments
Micro-simulation, spatial econometrics, cost-benefit and fiscal-space modelling, horizon scanning and political-economy analysis.
Delivery capacity
42 researchers, economists and modellers across epidemiology, health financing, GIS and bioethics.
Pillar 2

Implementation & Programme Delivery Arm

Technical assistance, direct execution and capacity building

  • Direct programme rollout and pilot scalability across maternal-child health, cross-border surveillance, nutrition hubs and safety nets.
  • Embedded technical assistance seconding senior advisors, health economists and data architects into line ministries and RECs.
  • SOP development codifying clinical pathways, MISP emergency response and multi-agency coordination manuals.
  • Institutional capacity building for decentralised civil servants, local councils and community health networks.
Core outputs
Programme designs, SOP libraries, service-delivery pilots, supply and referral pathways, trained frontline cadres.
Methods & instruments
Embedded technical assistance, results-based grant execution, MISP emergency response, sub-award management and procurement support.
Delivery capacity
Field teams across 14 countries with surge deployment inside 72 hours for outbreak and displacement events.
Pillar 3

MEL & Governance Advisory

Accountability, systems strengthening and oversight

  • Third-party monitoring and independent verification of multilateral programmes in high-risk and cross-border corridors.
  • Impact evaluation using RCTs, difference-in-differences and mixed-method process evaluation to measure attribution and ROI.
  • Digital MEL infrastructure: mobile-first pipelines, geospatial dashboards and automated anomaly detection against data falsification.
  • Public financial management and governance audits covering procurement integrity and expenditure tracking.
Core outputs
Independent verification reports, impact evaluations, governance and PFM audits, live MEL dashboards.
Methods & instruments
RCTs, difference-in-differences, mixed-method process evaluation, third-party monitoring and anomaly detection analytics.
Delivery capacity
Evaluation unit operating to OECD-DAC criteria with a firewalled reporting line to the Board Audit Committee.

Programmatic lifecycle

01

Diagnose

Burden, equity and fiscal-space diagnostics using national datasets, geospatial layers and community consultation.

02

Design

Costed intervention design with theory of change, indicator framework and explicit assumptions on attribution.

03

Pilot

Controlled implementation with embedded measurement to test feasibility, unit economics and delivery risk.

04

Scale

Government-owned scale-up with SOPs, workforce training, procurement pathways and digital reporting rails.

05

Evaluate

Independent evaluation, public financial audit and open publication of results — including null findings.

Engagement matrix

Multi-level institutional engagement

Who AAHRED works with at each level of governance, what it delivers there, the legal instruments used and the cadence of reporting back to partners.

Governance levelCore institutional clientsKey service offeringsEngagement instrumentsReporting cadence
Continental & MultilateralAfrican Union, Africa CDC, UNECA, WHO AFRO, World Bank, Global FundStrategic framework development, regional public goods governance, cross-border treaty alignment and macro-level grant evaluation.Framework agreements, technical secretariats, joint working groupsMulti-year (3–5 yrs)
Regional Economic CommunitiesEAC, IGAD, ECOWAS, SADCSurveillance harmonisation, cross-border migration protocols and trade-related biosecurity standards.Protocol harmonisation compacts, corridor surveillance MOUsAnnual review cycles
National GovernmentsMinistries of Health, Finance, Gender/Social Protection and AgriculturePolicy formulation, UHC benefit package design, fiscal space analysis and embedded ministerial technical assistance.Embedded advisory placements, costed national plans, MoUsBudget-cycle aligned
Sub-National & Local GovernanceCounty and district health directorates, municipalities, local councilsDecentralised planning, budget execution tracking, frontline worker training and community engagement architecture.County work plans, community compacts, frontline training grantsQuarterly

Closing the policy-to-execution gap

Unlike academic think tanks producing non-operational papers, or NGOs executing without rigorous evaluation, AAHRED unifies theoretical rigour with frontline delivery.

End-to-end programmatic lifecycle

Empirical research → policy drafting → pilot implementation → nationwide scale-up → independent impact evaluation.

South-led contextualisation

Endogenous African data models accounting for informal economies, pastoralist mobility and customary governance systems overlooked by external consultancies.

Evaluation standards

OECD-DAC criteria

Financial reporting

IFRS + 2 CFR 200

Data protection

GDPR / national DPAs

Safeguarding

PSEAH policy, independent channel